The importance of knowledge on the evaluation criteria in university scientific research projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i15.166Keywords:
evaluation, evaluation criteria, scientific research, research projectAbstract
Scientific research is part of any university mission, at least of big universities, as it represents the complementary element required by the learning process. A learning process based on engendering knowledge is much more valuable and competitive than a learning process which is reduced to a mere transfer of knowledge from the teacher to the students. The important universities consider that “the development of scientific research as a fundamental competence is essential for survival in a more and more competitive environment on global level and that is why, research should be part of the university mission”1. This study aims to highlight how important it is for the university members to be aware of the evaluation criteria for the research projects they undertake. For this purpose, I have interviewed a number of 55 persons, project managers and team members in the projects from the “Research for Excellency” program and the National Plan of Research, Development and Innovation PN II 2007 – 2013. Out of the evaluation criteria for research, the most important ones were considered to be the scientific quality of the project and the quality of the human resources involved in the project.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition (SCECO) agree to the following terms:
-
Copyright Retention
Authors retain full copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The published article is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits others to:-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially, as long as proper attribution is given to the original author(s) and source.
-
-
Additional Distribution
Authors may enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, include it in a book), with clear credit to the initial publication in SCECO. -
Preprint and Open Posting Policy
Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in preprint archives, institutional repositories, or personal websites) before submission, during review, and after publication.
This practice supports academic exchange and can lead to earlier and broader dissemination and citation of published work.
(See: “The Effect of Open Access” – PLOS)
For further inquiries regarding copyright, licensing, or archiving, please contact the editorial office at Editorial Board