ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME SEEN FROM THE EYES OF POTENTIAL BENEFICIARIES - DIRECT RESEARCH CARRIED OUT WITH STUDENTS -
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i30.443Keywords:
Erasmus programme, motivations, knowledge, interestAbstract
The ERASMUS programme was evaluated from a lot of point of views. Depending on the interest of the evaluation, studies were conducted to uncover information related to subjects like: the scope of the programme, the type of participants in the programme, the factors motivating the students to be mobile, the cost and funding of student mobility, the study conditions during the study period, the recognition of achievements during the study period abroad on return, the socio-cultural effect of the mobility (like becoming more “European”), the personal development effects etc. Based on the results of a direct research take on the students of the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacău, the paper presents a series of results with reference to: the knowledge held by the students with reference to the Erasmus + program, how they he perceives it, the reasons underlying the intention to benefit from the program, as well as those underlying the lack of interest in it. The research carried out was performed on a sample of 116 students from bachelor's degree studies - years II and III of studies selected according to non-probability criteria, so that the obtained results exclusively reveal their point of view.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition (SCECO) agree to the following terms:
-
Copyright Retention
Authors retain full copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The published article is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits others to:-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially, as long as proper attribution is given to the original author(s) and source.
-
-
Additional Distribution
Authors may enter into separate, non-exclusive contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, include it in a book), with clear credit to the initial publication in SCECO. -
Preprint and Open Posting Policy
Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in preprint archives, institutional repositories, or personal websites) before submission, during review, and after publication.
This practice supports academic exchange and can lead to earlier and broader dissemination and citation of published work.
(See: “The Effect of Open Access” – PLOS)
For further inquiries regarding copyright, licensing, or archiving, please contact the editorial office at Editorial Board