METHODOLOGIC ELEMENTS NECESSARY IN MAKING FORECASTS FOR REGIONAL

Authors

  • Dumitru Timerman
  • Mihai Deju

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i13.31

Abstract

Regional picture appear two Romanians: a richer, which includes the Bucharest-Ilfov, West and Center and a poor, other regions. Among the most competitive districts are Ilfov (8. 553 euro per capita), Timiş (7. 931 euro per capita), Braşov (7. 108 euro per capita), Arad (6. 675 euro per capita), Cluj (6. 561 euro per capita), Constanta (6. 368 euro per capita), and among the poorest - Botosani (2. 745 euro per capita) and Vaslui (2. 930 euro per capita). According to a report by the National Prognosis Commission (CNP), while Bucharest-Ilfov region will have a GDP per capita of 11. 694 euros next year, the Northeast will remain poverty pole, 3. 826 euro per capita. Economists argue that, if not reduce disparities, mainly through public investment, we could assist in disruption of important social and economic environment. Lowering differences would include the maintenance of close growth rates of GDP / capita, and these important gaps. Economic analysts draw attention to the dangers which may arise due to different levels of development. Develop forecasts in territorial - at regional or county-is a necessary and useful approach in the perspective of Romania in the European Union. From this point of the assessment of regional economic disparities and the potential development of each area provides an important support kinesiology orientation and use with maximum efficiency of the structural funds and cohesion funds that Romania will benefit by integrating. Regional forecasts provide information on possible future development, with employment in the global data of the national economy as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

17.12.2008

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Timerman, D., & Deju, M. (2008). METHODOLOGIC ELEMENTS NECESSARY IN MAKING FORECASTS FOR REGIONAL. Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, 13, pp. 103-108. https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i13.31